Skip to content
MyClaimWorth
independent · editorial · no legal pitch

What is your injury claim actually worth?

Plain-English guides to personal injury settlements in fifteen jurisdictions across North America, Europe, the Asia-Pacific, and Oceania. Written for the injured, not the lawyers — with the published guidelines, statutory caps, quantum tables, and the questions adjusters actually ask.

Sourced

Every band cited to a named, dated authority document — JC Guidelines, PIG, state verdict reporters.

Independent

No affiliate links, no pay-for-listing, no sponsored content. Editorial independence is the asset.

Plain-English

Statutes and guideline texts translated for the people whose settlements depend on them.

Reviewed

Quarterly review against the underlying authority; immediate update on statutory or guideline change.

Anchored to published authorities
Editorial — never legal advice
Sources cited on every page
Five jurisdictions, one place
the direct answer

What is your personal injury claim worth?

The whole system, in three paragraphs. Every figure traces to a named authority on the country page.

tl;dr

A claim is worth special damages (evidenced losses) plus general damages (pain and suffering), reduced by your share of fault under the local comparative-fault rule, and capped if a statutory cap applies.

A personal injury claim is a formal demand for compensation following an injury caused by another party's negligence — a road traffic collision, a workplace accident, a slip on a defective floor, a medical error, a defective product. The value of the claim is the sum of special damages (quantifiable financial losses, evidenced by receipts) and general damages (non-financial losses such as pain, suffering, and loss of amenity), reduced by any percentage of fault attributed to the claimant under the local comparative-fault rule, and capped where statutory caps apply.

Typical settlement ranges across all fifteen jurisdictions, sourced to the named authority on each country page:

Every band on this site traces to a named authority document. See /methodology for how each band is derived, /sources for the standing authority list, and /disclaimer for what this page does not promise.

quick facts

What MyClaimWorth actually does.

The basics in plain language. No marketing fluff.

MyClaimWorth is a free editorial publication on personal injury claim valuation in fifteen jurisdictions: the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Ireland, Spain, Italy, Germany, France, New Zealand, Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. No calculator on this domain — its job is to explain the system, not quote your case.

Every band on the site is anchored to a named authority document: state-by-state US tort law and statutory caps, the UK Judicial College Guidelines (16th edition), the Irish Personal Injuries Guidelines, the Canadian Andrews trilogy non-pecuniary cap (CPI-adjusted), and state-by-state Australian Civil Liability Acts plus CTP impairment scales.

Drafts are produced with AI assistance and reviewed by a human editor before publication. We do not publish AI-generated copy without human review, do not invent quotes or citations, and do not republish copyrighted text from the official guidelines.

Coverage spans 51 US jurisdictions (50 states plus DC), 4 UK nations, 13 Canadian provinces and territories, 8 Australian states and territories, and Ireland. Phase 2 will add civil-law markets — Spain, Italy, Germany, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland, Austria.

Sponsorship inventory exists, but is segregated from editorial. Sponsors do not see editorial copy before publication, cannot move bands, and cannot influence which authority is cited on a page. Sponsored cards are clearly labelled and never appear inside editorial bands or FAQs.

Corrections are logged at the foot of any affected page with the date and a short note. The last-updated stamp on every page reflects the most recent substantive review, not a perfunctory bump. Email hello@myclaimworth.com to flag an error.

what's on the site

Built for the person actually living through it.

Everything you need to value a claim before you meet a lawyer — and the lawyer-grade authority underneath each figure.

Settlement bands by injury type

Whiplash, back injury, head injury, fracture, medical negligence, workplace — each indicative band sourced to the named authority on the country page.

Comparative-fault map

Every US state mapped to its rule — pure-comparative, modified-50, modified-51, or contributory. Plus the equivalent overseas frameworks.

Statute of limitations matrix

The deadline by which a claim must be filed in each covered jurisdiction, with the statutory citation for each row.

Personal injury glossary

A working glossary of the terminology — special damages, comparative fault, the multiplier method, MICRA, Andrews cap, PIAB, CTP, SABS, and many more.

Methodology and sources

How every band on the site is derived. Per-jurisdiction methodology, named authority documents, last-consulted dates, inflation adjustment, and known limits.

AI calculator (sister project)

For a personalised US case estimate, FairSettlement runs an AI-driven calculator. The two sites cover the same geography for different intents.

covered jurisdictions

Settlement values vary by country. See yours.

Fifteen jurisdictions: the major English-speaking common-law markets, the Western European civil-law markets with structured quantum tables, plus six Asia-Pacific jurisdictions (NZ, Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan).

the framework · eight steps

How a personal injury settlement is calculated.

Every English-speaking jurisdiction follows the same eight-step framework, with local variations in the authority cited at step three and the cap applied at step five. This is what practitioners actually do — not a marketing flowchart.

  1. 1
    Reach medical stability and document everything

    Wait until prognosis is reasonably stable — settling before then risks under-valuing long-term consequences. Keep contemporaneous records: GP and hospital notes, imaging, specialist letters, prescriptions, payslips, receipts. Documentation gaps are the single biggest source of under-valued settlements.

  2. 2
    Calculate special damages

    Add up every quantifiable financial loss: past and future medical expenses, lost wages and loss of earning capacity, property damage, travel to medical appointments, prescriptions, and ongoing care. Each line should trace to a receipt, payslip, invoice, or expert report.

  3. 3
    Identify the relevant authority

    In England and Wales, that is the Judicial College Guidelines (16th edition) plus the Whiplash Reform tariffs where they apply. In Ireland, the Personal Injuries Guidelines. In Canada, the Andrews-cap-adjusted ceiling plus provincial precedent. In Australia, the relevant state Civil Liability Act and CTP scheme. In the United States, state-by-state authority — jury verdict reporters, judicial council guidelines if published, and any statutory cap.

  4. 4
    Anchor general (non-economic) damages to the authority

    Identify the band that matches the injury severity in the relevant guideline. Avoid the temptation to use the maximum band — the median for a comparable case is usually closer to where it settles. In the US, multipliers of 1.5×–5× of medical specials are a common starting point but not a rule of law.

  5. 5
    Apply comparative fault and statutory caps

    Reduce by the percentage of fault attributed to the claimant under the jurisdiction’s rule (pure / modified-50 / modified-51 / contributory). Apply any statutory cap on non-economic or punitive damages. In the US, MICRA and similar caps have changed substantially in recent years — use the version current to the date of injury.

  6. 6
    Build the demand letter

    Set out liability (with evidence), special damages (with documentation), general damages (anchored to authority), and the offer to settle, with a deadline. Most cases settle on the demand letter without ever reaching court.

  7. 7
    Negotiate

    Insurers commonly open 30–50% below where claims actually settle. A counter-offer should reference the authority and the documentation, not vague language about pain. Represented claimants statistically settle for 2–3× more than unrepresented claimants because firms know the bands and the negotiation playbook.

  8. 8
    Settle, sign, and close

    On agreement, the insurer disburses the agreed amount, outstanding liens (medical, statutory, employer where applicable) are satisfied from the proceeds, and the file closes with a release of all claims. For larger US awards, a structured settlement (periodic payments) is often preferable to a lump sum on tax and longevity grounds.

typical bands by injury type

What does an injury settle for?

Indicative settlement ranges by injury type across the five covered jurisdictions. Bands are sourced from the named authority on each country page and reflect typical settlement values, not maximum awards. Severity, prognosis, and comparative fault all shift specific cases up or down within the band.

Indicative personal injury settlement bands by injury type and jurisdiction.
Injury typeUKIrelandUnited StatesCanadaAustralia
Whiplash / soft tissue (minor)£240 – £4,345€500 – €3,000$3k – $15kC$5k – C$25kAU$5k – AU$15k
Whiplash / soft tissue (1–2 years)£4,345 – £24,990€3,000 – €12,000$10k – $40kC$15k – C$70kAU$15k – AU$50k
Back injury (moderate)£12,510 – £41,090€15,000 – €40,000$30k – $100kC$40k – C$150kAU$30k – AU$120k
Back injury (severe, surgery)£38,780 – £160,980€50,000 – €175,000$80k – $400kC$120k – Andrews capAU$120k – AU$600k
Concussion / mild brain injury£15,320 – £43,060€25,000 – €70,000$25k – $100kC$30k – C$120kAU$30k – AU$130k
Severe traumatic brain injury£282,010 – £403,990€175,000 – €550,000$500k – multi-millionC$200k – Andrews capAU$300k – AU$750k+
Wrist or arm fracture£7,420 – £45,840€10,000 – €70,000$15k – $80kC$20k – C$100kAU$15k – AU$80k
Medical negligence (non-fatal)£20,000 – £400,000+€30,000 – €400,000+$30k – statutory cap (varies)C$30k – Andrews capAU$30k – AU$500k
Workplace injury (lost-time)£5,000 – £100,000+€10,000 – €150,000workers’ comp + civilWSIB / WCB + tortWorkCover + civil

Sources: Judicial College Guidelines (16th ed., 2024) for UK · Personal Injuries Guidelines (Judicial Council 2021, as amended) for Ireland · state-by-state US tort law and statutory caps, jury verdict reporters · Andrews v Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd. (1978) inflation-adjusted for Canada · state Civil Liability Acts and CTP schemes for Australia. See /methodology.

who reads this site

Written for the person at the other end of a recent accident.

Plain enough for someone who has just been injured. Precise enough for the specialist who needs the citation.

People with a recent injury

The primary reader. You want to understand the valuation framework before you commit to representation. We give you the bands and the citation — not a marketing pitch.

Trainees and paralegals

Comparative summaries across jurisdictions, sourced to authority. Useful when a senior lawyer asks you to scope quantum across borders before a client meeting.

Claims handlers and adjusters

A sanity check against your own training. Bands here come from the same documents you cite in your own assessments — but laid out plainly, with the cross-jurisdictional view.

Journalists and researchers

Background on tort frameworks, statutory caps, and reform history. Sources cited per claim. Quote freely with attribution.

browse by injury

What kind of injury are you valuing?

Six common injury patterns, valued across all five jurisdictions. Each links to its own deep dive.

comparative-fault rules · united states

Which rule does your state apply?

Every US state applies one of four rules to allocate fault. The rule changes outcomes radically: in a contributory state, 1% claimant fault recovers nothing; in a pure-comparative state, even 99% claimant fault still recovers 1%.

United States comparative-fault rules by state.
RuleStates that apply it
Pure contributory negligence (1% bars recovery)Alabama · Maryland · North Carolina · Virginia · DC
Pure comparative (recovery up to 99% fault)Alaska · Arizona · California · Florida · Kentucky · Louisiana · Mississippi · Missouri · New Mexico · New York · Rhode Island · South Dakota · Washington
Modified comparative — 50% barArkansas · Colorado · Georgia · Idaho · Kansas · Maine · Nebraska · North Dakota · Tennessee · Utah
Modified comparative — 51% barConnecticut · Delaware · Hawaii · Illinois · Indiana · Iowa · Massachusetts · Michigan · Minnesota · Montana · Nevada · New Hampshire · New Jersey · Ohio · Oklahoma · Oregon · Pennsylvania · South Carolina · Texas · Vermont · West Virginia · Wisconsin · Wyoming

Sources: state statutory rules and case law as in force at publication. Verify against the state authority for any live case.

statute of limitations · the deadline matrix

You have a deadline. Here it is.

A statute of limitations is the legal deadline by which a personal injury claim must be filed. Beyond it, the claim is generally extinguished. Limitation can pause for minors, latent injuries, and claims against public bodies — but those exceptions are narrow.

Statute of limitations for personal injury claims by jurisdiction.
JurisdictionLimitation periodSource
United Kingdom (England, Wales, NI)3 years from date of injury or knowledgeLimitation Act 1980, s.11
United Kingdom (Scotland)3 years from date of injury or knowledgePrescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973
Republic of Ireland2 years from date of injury or knowledgeStatute of Limitations 1957 (as amended 2004)
Canada (most provinces)2 years from date of injury or discoverabilityProvincial Limitations Acts
Canada (Quebec)3 years from date of injuryCivil Code of Québec, art. 2925
Australia (most states)3 years from date of injury or discoverabilityState Limitation Acts
United States — California2 years for personal injuryCal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1
United States — Texas2 yearsTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003
United States — Florida2 years (was 4; HB 837 reform)Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(a)
United States — New York3 yearsCPLR § 214
United States — Illinois2 years735 ILCS 5/13-202
United States — Pennsylvania2 years42 Pa.C.S. § 5524
United States — Maine6 years14 M.R.S. § 752 (longest in US)
personal injury terms, defined

The vocabulary your adjuster uses.

Eighteen of the most common terms here; the full glossary, with one page per term, will live at /glossary.

General damages
Compensation for non-financial losses caused by an injury, including pain, suffering, loss of amenity, and reduced quality of life.
In England and Wales, general damages are calculated using the Judicial College Guidelines; in Ireland, the Personal Injuries Guidelines. In US tort law these are typically called non-economic damages and may be subject to statutory caps.
UK · Ireland · Canada · Australia
Special damages
Compensation for quantifiable financial losses tied to an injury — medical expenses, lost income, property damage, and ongoing care costs.
Special damages must be evidenced (receipts, payslips, invoices). They form the calculable foundation of any claim before non-economic damages are added.
Non-economic damages
A US term for compensation covering pain, suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, and emotional distress — losses without a fixed dollar value.
Several US states cap non-economic damages, particularly in medical malpractice (California MICRA, Texas, Florida). The rest of the world calls these general damages.
United States
Comparative fault
A doctrine that reduces a claimant’s damages by the percentage of fault attributed to them.
States and countries vary: pure comparative reduces by the percentage with no bar to recovery; modified-50 bars recovery if the claimant is 50% or more at fault; modified-51 bars at 51%; contributory bars if the claimant is even 1% at fault.
Contributory negligence
A rule that bars a claimant from any recovery if they bore any responsibility for their own injury.
Only four US states and the District of Columbia still apply pure contributory negligence: Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, Virginia, and DC. Most jurisdictions have moved to comparative-fault rules.
AL · MD · NC · VA · DC
Pure comparative negligence
A rule that allows a claimant to recover damages even if they were 99% at fault, with the award reduced by their percentage of fault.
Thirteen US states use pure comparative, including California, Florida, New York, and Washington. Most of the UK and Australia operate similarly through their own statutory frameworks.
Modified comparative negligence
A rule that allows recovery only if the claimant’s share of fault is below a threshold (50% or 51%, depending on the state).
Most US states use modified comparative. Texas, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and many others apply the 51% bar; others use 50%. Above the threshold, recovery drops to zero.
Statute of limitations
The legal deadline by which a personal injury claim must be filed in court.
Limitation varies by jurisdiction and by claim type. Most US states allow two or three years from the date of injury; UK general limitation is three years for personal injury; Ireland is two years. Missing it usually extinguishes the claim entirely.
Statute of repose
An absolute deadline tied to the underlying event (often product manufacture or service rendered) that runs even when the injured person has not yet discovered the harm.
Most common in US product-liability and construction-defect contexts. Unlike a limitation period, a repose statute can bar a claim before the cause of action has accrued.
United States
Multiplier method
A common shorthand used by US adjusters in which non-economic damages are estimated as a multiple (typically 1.5x to 5x) of the special damages.
It is a starting point, not a rule of law. Severity, permanence, and the strength of medical evidence pull the multiplier higher; pre-existing conditions and weak liability pull it lower.
United States
Per-diem method
A method that values pain and suffering at a daily rate multiplied by the number of days the claimant is expected to suffer.
Less commonly used than the multiplier method; sometimes presented to juries to make a non-economic figure feel concrete.
United States
Judicial College Guidelines
The standard reference work, currently in its 16th edition, used by courts in England and Wales (and persuasively in Northern Ireland) to assess general damages in personal injury cases.
Updated every two years to reflect inflation and case law. Solicitors and barristers cite the relevant JCG band as the starting point for any quantum negotiation.
England · Wales · Northern Ireland
Personal Injuries Guidelines
The Irish Judicial Council’s published quantum framework that replaced the prior Book of Quantum.
Used by both the Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB) and the courts to assess general damages. Substantial recasting of soft-tissue and minor-injury bands compared to the old Book.
Republic of Ireland
PIAB
The Personal Injuries Assessment Board, a statutory body in Ireland that assesses most personal injury claims before they can proceed to court.
Most Irish PI claims start at PIAB. Either side can reject the assessment and proceed to litigation; if both accept, the assessment becomes binding.
Republic of Ireland
Andrews cap
The Canadian non-pecuniary damages cap established by the 1978 Supreme Court trilogy of Andrews v Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd., Thornton v Prince George School District, and Arnold v Teno.
Set originally at C$100,000 in 1978 dollars, indexed by Bank of Canada CPI; the present-day ceiling sits in the C$400,000s for the most catastrophic cases. Applies to non-pecuniary loss only.
Canada
SABS
The Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule, the Ontario regulation governing first-party accident benefits paid by an injured driver’s own insurer.
SABS sits alongside the tort claim against the at-fault driver. Ontario also imposes statutory deductibles on non-pecuniary tort awards below threshold amounts.
Ontario, Canada
CTP
Compulsory Third Party motor insurance — the mandatory bodily-injury cover attached to a vehicle’s registration in every Australian state and territory.
Each state runs its own CTP scheme: NSW under the Motor Accidents Injuries Act 2017, Victoria under the TAC, Queensland under the MAIC, and so on. Each scheme has its own thresholds and benefit structures.
Australia
MICRA
The California Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act, a statutory cap on non-economic damages in medical-malpractice cases.
The 1975 cap of $250,000 was reformed by AB 35 (effective 2023) to a phased schedule rising over ten years; the current cap depends on whether the case involves a death and the year the case is filed.
California
guides worth reading

Go deeper.

Pillar guides covering the parts of the system that don't fit cleanly on a country page. Each is 3,000–5,500 words and built to be the definitive resource for its topic.

frequently asked, plain-english

The questions readers actually ask.

Thirty-five of the questions readers actually ask. Each answer is independently coherent — built so AI engines can cite a single Q&A without losing meaning.

How claim value is built

Process, evidence, and the practical questions

settlement insider · weekly

A weekly email on what cases actually settle for.

Adjuster tactics, real bands, guideline updates. No pitch, no spam, unsubscribe in one click.

us cases · personalised estimate
Our sister project runs an AI calculator for US cases.

This site is editorial. For a walk-through of your specific US case with a personalised range, FairSettlement is the companion tool.

Open FairSettlement
Last reviewed and updated · By MyClaimWorth Editorial